Student Perceptions of Teacher’s Use of Written Feedback and Face-To-Face
Keywords:
Assessment, Written feedback, Face-to-face conferencingAbstract
Teachers provide feedback to their students throughout the instructional sequence, specifically during formative assessments. This feedback can take many forms, including video, audio recordings, face-to-face conferences, and written comments. In research conducted on these four forms of feedback, most studies found that students preferred video, audio, or face-to-face feedback over written comments; however, these studies were almost always conducted at the university level. Middle School students’ perceptions of different feedback methods were not addressed. This qualitative study used open-ended survey questions with two middle school English Language Arts classes (a total of 37 students) to investigate student perceptions of two modes of feedback—solely written comments and written comments accompanying a face-to-face conference. Each class received one form of feedback during the first instructional unit and then another form of feedback during the second unit. Students shared their perceptions about each form following each unit and their preferences after both units concluded. The study found that most students preferred face-to-face conferences with written comments to solely written feedback. The study’s results indicated that a teacher should determine which skills/units would benefit most from face-to-face conferences, remind students to go back and review comments on their work before beginning a summative assignment to help them remember the face-to-face conference, and develop a positive classroom culture regarding face-to-face conferencing with the teacher.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Education Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material.
The author(s) of a manuscript agree that if the manuscript is accepted for publication in the journal, the published article will be copyrighted using a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license. This license allows others to freely copy, distribute, and display the copyrighted work, and derivative works based upon it, under certain specified conditions.
Authors are responsible for obtaining written permission to include any images or artwork for which they do not hold copyright in their articles, or to adapt any such images or artwork for inclusion in their articles. The copyright holder must be made explicitly aware that the image(s) or artwork will be made freely available online as part of the article under a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.